Willingness to pay for innovation projects in livestock farming in the southwest of Holguin
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51896/rilcods.v5i46.261Keywords:
preferences, willingness to participate, ecosystem management, sustainable agriculture, livestock productionAbstract
To analyze the willingness to pay for innovation projects in livestock farming in the southwest of Holguín, three attributes of a technical-environmental nature and one related to the innovation system were defined, each with three levels in increasing order of improvement, as well as one attribute quantitative analysis of four progressive levels for the costs of the alternatives, which formed two generic alternatives. Discrete choice experiment of incomplete factorial design with orthogonal arrangement was carried out to estimate the main effects, of 48 combinations, with 52 sample units. The effects were evaluated using a logistic model. The Marginal Substitution Ratio, the Implicit Price and the Compensatory Surplus were determined. Of the valid observations, 97.6% promote local livestock innovation. The adjustment of the model was highly significant and within it the cost per hectare. The global analysis of the scenarios was statistically significant for both modes of action and the compensatory surplus shows greater advantages for the set of moderately innovative practices, which do not involve all the improvements that could contribute to the reduction of degradation, and which are oriented towards the dual-purpose systems. There is a willingness to pay for dual-purpose production systems, with the use of trees, seasonal farm management and through an innovation project. Dual-purpose systems, as well as rearing and fattening, are economically viable. It is necessary to institutionalize the innovation system if sustainability is desired to carry out research-action projects in the southwest of Holguín.
References
Almaguer-Pérez, N., Peña-Borrego, M., Peña-Rueda, Y., Peña-Aguilera, N. y Zayas-Infante, S. (2021). Lecciones aprendidas y proyecciones para el desarrollo agrario en el municipio Calixto García. Revista Cubana de Educación Superior, 40(2), e14.
Benítez, D., Ricardo, Y., Romero, A., Guevara, O., Torres, V., Ramírez, A., Pérez, B., Miranda, M., Guerra, J. y Olivera, C. (2009). Alternativas para la producción sostenible de carne vacuna en el Valle del Cauto. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science, 43(4), 369-378.
Cino, D. M., Martín, P. y Torres, V. (2004). Estudio económico preliminar de alternativas de producción de leche bovina. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science, 38(1), 3-11.
CITMA. (2020). Indicaciones metodológicas para la actividad de Programas y Proyectos de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (pp. 108). La Habana: Dirección de Programas y Proyectos Estratégicos y Dirección General de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación.
Danne, M. y Musshoff, O. (2017). Analysis of farmers’ willingness to participate in pasture grazing programs: Results from a discrete choice experiment with German dairy farmers. Joumal of Dairy Science, 100(9), 7569–7580. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-12756
Díaz-Canel, M., Núñez, J. y Torres, C. (2020). Ciencia e innovación como pilar de la gestión de gobierno: un camino hacia los sistemas alimentarios locales. COODES, 8(3), 367-387.
EPCG. (2019). Boletin estadístico de la Empresa Pecuaria Calixto García. In E. P. Rodríguez (Ed.), (Diciembre 2018 ed., pp. 20). Buenaventura: MINAG.
García-Torres, S., López-Gajardo, A. y Mesías, F. J. (2016). Intensive vs. free-range organic beef. A preference study through consumer liking and conjoint analysis. Meat Science, 114, 114-120. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.12.019
Gaspar, P., Escribano, M. y Mesias, F. J. (2016). A qualitative approach to study social perceptions and public policies in dehesa agroforestry systems. Land Use Policy, 58, 427–436. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.040
Hernández-Sosa, M., Planos-Gutiérrez, E. O. y Boudet-Rouco, D. (2018). Influencia de los factores físico-geográficos en la configuración espacio-temporal de la lluvia: Estudio de casos en Cuba. Revista Cubana de Meteorología, 24(1), 61-74.
Holmes, T. P., Adamowicz, W. L. y Carlsson, F. (2017). Chapter 5 Choice Experiments. En P. P.A. Champ, K. Boyle y T. Brown (Eds.), A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation (2nd ed., Vol. 13, p. 133-186). Dordrecht: Springer.
Hoyos, D. (2010). The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments Ecological Economics, 69, 1595-1603. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.011
IBM. (2013). IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 22.0.0.0): International Business Machines Corp.
Landini, F., Brites, W. y Mathot y Rebolé, M. (2017a). Towards a new paradigm for rural extensionists’ in-service training. Journal of Rural Studies, 51, 158-167. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.02.010
Landini, F., Vargas, G., Bianqui, V., Mathot y Rebolé, M. y Martínez, M. (2017b). Contributions to group work and to the management of collective processes in extension and rural development. Journal of Rural Studies, 56, 143-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.09.014
Li, X., Jensen, K. L., Clark, C. D. y Lambert, D. M. (2016). Consumer willingness to pay for beef grown using climate friendly production practices. Food Policy, 64, 93-106. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.003
MINAG. (2012). Res No. 768/2012. Manual de Procedimientos complementario del Reglamento del Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Forestal. Gaceta Oficial de la República de Cuba, 164(O27), 555-567.
Murgueitio, E., Chará, J. D., Barahona, R. y Rivera, J. E. (2019). Development of sustainable cattle rearing in silvopastoral systems in Latin America. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science, 53(1), 65-71.
ONEI. (2019). Anuario Estadístico Calixto García 2018 (2019 ed., 105 p.). Buenaventura, Cuba: ONEI.
Peña-Rueda, Y., Benítez-Jiménez, D., Almaguer-Pérez, N. y Pacheco-Peña, C. (2019). Caracterización de la ganadería vacuna del sector campesino en el suroeste de Holguín. Pastos y Forrajes, 42(4), 300-308.
Rieple, A. y Snijders, S. (2018). The role of emotions in the choice to adopt, or resist, innovations by Irish dairy farmers. Journal of Business Research, 85, 23–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.039
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Yuri Freddy Peña-Rueda, Nelvis Alipio Almaguer-Pérez, Islán Torres-Pupo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Usted es libre de:
- Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
- Adaptar — remezclar, transformar y construir a partir del material
Bajo los siguientes términos:
- Atribución — Usted debe dar crédito de manera adecuada, brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante.
- NoComercial — Usted no puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales.
