Vol. 6 No. 53 (2024): March
Artículos

Legal framework and corruption, its effect on the entrepreneurial intention of professors and students of a University Center in the South of the State of Mexico.

PDF (Español (España)) HTML (Español (España))
  • Marcela Jaramillo Jaramillo,
  • Patricia García Hernández ,
  • Manuel Antonio Pérez Chávez
Marcela Jaramillo Jaramillo
Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México.
Patricia García Hernández
Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México.
Manuel Antonio Pérez Chávez
Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51896/rilcods.v6i53.480

Published 2024-04-09

Keywords

  • business legal framework,
  • corruption,
  • systemic conditions,
  • university entrepreneursh

How to Cite

Jaramillo Jaramillo, M., García Hernández , P., & Pérez Chávez, M. A. (2024). Legal framework and corruption, its effect on the entrepreneurial intention of professors and students of a University Center in the South of the State of Mexico. Desarrollo Sustentable, Negocios, Emprendimiento Y Educación, 6(53), 104–121. https://doi.org/10.51896/rilcods.v6i53.480
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Abstract

According to Arreola (2014), Mexico is the second-best country in Latin America to undertake, since it has policies, regulations, demand conditions and social capital, in accordance with those stipulated in the index of systemic conditions for entrepreneurship. According to this tool, both the existence of a legal framework and the presence of corruption are factors that have great influence on the decision to undertake, since it can constitute a limitation or advantage for the development of business activity. For this reason, the present work aims to determine the incidence of these factors in the entrepreneurial intention of professors and students at a University Center in the South of the State of Mexico. To carry out the work, information will be collected from a sample of 54 professors and 900 students from the University Center. A descriptive statistical analysis will be carried out with the crosstab technique that will reflect the relationship between the intention to undertake and the components of the legal framework and corruption. In addition, the binary logistic regression tool will be applied to determine the significant influence of these factors with respect to the main variable intention to undertake. These factors are expected to have a significant influence on the intention to undertake.

PDF (Español (España)) HTML (Español (España))

References

  1. Arreola, J. (2014, 24 de julio). Las universidades y su impacto en el emprendimiento en México.Forbes. https://www.forbes.com.mx/las-universidades-y-su-impacto-en-el-emprendimiento enmexico./
  2. Bjornskov, CH.; Foss, N.J. (2008), “Economic freedom and entrepreneurial activity: Some cross-country evidence”, Public Choice, Vol. 134, pp. 307-328.
  3. De Benedetto, M. (2023). Corrupción y lucha contra la corrupción desde una perspectiva regulatoria. Eunomía. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad, 24, pp. 402-417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2023.7680
  4. Indeed (2023). Qué es el marco legal de una empresa. Equipo editorial de Indeed. https://tinyurl.com/26yn8ck2
  5. Niebles, W.; Niebles, Nuñez, L. D. & Barrios Parejo, I. A. (2020). El emprendimiento en Colombia: análisis del marco legal y su incidencia en la generación de empleo. Justicia, 25(38), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.17081/just.25.38.4390
  6. Romero, A. M., & Milone, M. (2016). El Emprendimiento en España: Intención Emprendedora, Motivaciones y Obstáculos. Journal of Globalization, Competitiveness & Governability / Revista de Globalización, Competitividad y Gobernabilidad / Revista de Globalização, Competitividade e Governabilidade, 10(1), 95-109. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/5118/511854473005.pdf
  7. Sánchez, J. (2018). Análisis comparativo del combate a la corrupción en España y México. una perspectiva de sus controles y órganos. Revista Internacional Transparencia e Integridad. No. 7chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/http://www.encuentros-multidisciplinares.org/revista-67/jose-juan-sanchez.pdf
  8. Shepherd, D.A.; Parida, V. y Wincent, J. (2022). Corruption as Corporate Entrepreneurship. In: Entrepreneurial Responses to Chronic Adversity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04884-5_7
  9. Shepherd, Dean; Parida,Vinit &Wincent, Joakim (2022) Corruption as Corporate Entrepreneurship.
  10. Tessema, Mussie; Beraki, Tesfayohannes;Tewolde, Sebhatleab y Andemariam Kifleyesus (2014) Causes of Corruption from Entrepreneurs’ Perceptions: Theoretical and Practical Implications. International Review of Management and Business Research. 3(4), 2023-2038
  11. Traikova, Diana; Manolova, Tatiana S.; Möllers, Judith y Buchenrieder Gertrud (2017) Corruption perceptions and entrepreneurial intentions in a transitional context–the case of rural Bulgaria. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship. 22( 3), 1-2 DOI: 10.1142/S1084946717500182
  12. Transparency International, (2018). Corruption Perception Index. Recuperado de: http://www.transparency.org/cpi2018. Rangel, Christi (2017). Corrupción, implicaciones y herramientas para enfretarla. Conference Paper, Junio. (PDF) Corrupción, implicaciones y herramientas para enfrentarla. (researchgate.net)
  13. Transparency International. (2016). Anti-corruption glossary. TITLE © YEAR by Transparency International. Licensed under CC-BY-ND 4.0 Recuperado de https://www.transparency.org/glossary/term/petty_corruption
  14. Yingjun Zhu J. y Qamruzzaman Md. (2021) Access to finance and legal framework in female entrepreneurship development in Bangladesh: The mediating role of self-leadership. Asian Economic and Financial Review. 11 (9), 762-780. DOI: 10.18488/journal.aefr.2021.119.762.780
  15. Zamora, Clarisa (2018). La importancia del emprendimiento en la economía: el caso de Ecuador. Revista Espacios. 39 (07), 15- 27.