The mirage of entrepreneurship:
A critical analysis of the true face of multilevel marketing in Mexico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51896/rilcods.v7i74.1069Keywords:
multilevel, entrepreneurship, informal economy, pyramid scheme, network marketingAbstract
In Mexico, multi-level companies have been promoted as an accessible alternative for entrepreneurship, especially among vulnerable sectors seeking economic independence without requiring high investments or advanced technical knowledge. However, this article reveals that this model does not constitute genuine entrepreneurship, but rather a structure that distorts the essential principles of authentic entrepreneurship, such as innovation, value creation, autonomy, and the generation of real solutions. Unlike productive pusieses, multi-level marketing relies on pyramid schemes centered around constant recruitment rather than the production of goods or services. This approach prioritizes network growth over productivity, encouraging behaviors that lead to deceptive or abusive practices. Based on academic studies, sector data, and testimonies, the analysis shows that most participants do not obtain sustainable benefits and end up leaving the system after experiencing economic losses and deterioration in their personal and family relationships. Furthermore, mechanisms of emotional manipulation, exaggerated promises of success, and coercive coaching are identified that exploit economic vulnerability, disguising aggressive marketing as personal empowerment. The article also examines the role of certain institutional discourses and public policies that, without critical analysis, have indirectly legitimized this model as entrepreneurship. Finally, a clear differentiation is proposed between self-employment, businesses with real productive bases, and pyramid schemes, emphasizing the need for financial education, adequate regulation, and the promotion of sustainable models with local economic impact and real social value.
References
Bárcenas, M. (2020). Mujeres en el multinivel: trabajo emocional y endeudamiento en México. Revista de Estudios Críticos del Trabajo, 15(2), 34-58.
Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Duke University Press.
Boltanski, L., y Chiapello, È. (2005). El nuevo espíritu del capitalismo. Akal.
Braun, V., y Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bröckling, U. (2007). The entrepreneurial self: Fabricating a new type of subject. SAGE Publications.
CONEVAL. (2022). Informe de evaluación de la política de desarrollo social 2022. https://www.coneval.org.mx
Consumer Awareness Institute. (2021). MLM industry report on income disclosure. https://mlm-thetruth.com
Dardot, P., y Laval, C. (2013). La nueva razón del mundo: Ensayo sobre la sociedad neoliberal. Gedisa.
De Soto, H. (1989). El otro sendero: La revolución informal. Editorial Diana.
De Sousa Santos, B. (2010). Descolonizar el saber, reinventar el poder. Ediciones Trilce.
Ehrenreich, B. (2009). Bright-sided: How the relentless promotion of positive thinking has undermined America. Metropolitan Books.
Expósito, E., y Marsollier, R. (2020). Virtualidad y educación en tiempos de COVID-19. Un estudio empírico en Argentina. Educación y Humanismo, 22(39), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17081/eduhum.22.39.4214
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
Fals Borda, O. (1985). Conocimiento y poder popular. Siglo XXI Editores.
Fassin, D. (2012). Humanitarian reason: A moral history of the present. University of California Press.
FitzPatrick, R. (2017). False Profits: Seeking Financial and Spiritual Deliverance in Multi-Level Marketing and Pyramid Schemes. Consumer Awareness Institute.
FitzPatrick, R. (2019). Multilevel marketing: The consumer protection challenge of endless chain opportunity schemes. Journal of Business y Economics Research (JBER), 17(2), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v17i2.10262
Gago, V. (2017). La razón neoliberal: economías barrocas y pragmática popular. Tinta Limón.
González Rodríguez, M. (2020). Multinivel y afectos: el trabajo emocional como motor del emprendimiento precario. Revista de Estudios Críticos del Trabajo, 18(2), 45-66.
Habermas, J. (1987). Conocimiento e interés. Taurus.
Harding, S. (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. Cornell University Press.
Herrera Fustamante, J, M. (2021) Impacto ocupacional del trabajo remoto en docentes durante la emergencia sanitaria en una institución educativa. Chota - Cajamarca 2020 [Tesis de licenciatura, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos]
Hochschild, A. R. (2012). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
Illouz, E. (2007). Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Polity Press.
Jones, A. (2022). Behind the Pink Curtain: The Emotional Toll of MLM Participation. Journal of Feminist Economics, 28(1), 75–93.
Jonsson, M. (2020). Networked scams: The invisible labor and financial losses of multilevel marketing participants. Sociological Inquiry, 90(4), 865–887. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12315
Kincheloe, J. L., y McLaren, P. (2011). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. En N. K. Denzin y Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 163–177). SAGE Publications.
Marx, K. (2004). El capital. Crítica de la economía política (Vol. 1). Fondo de Cultura Económica. (Original publicado en 1867)
Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. Bloomsbury Academic.
Taylor, C. (2019). Multi-Level Marketing Unmasked: The Hidden Costs of ‘Empowerment’. Business Ethics Quarterly, 29(3), 315–342.
Thompson, E. P. (1971). The moral economy of the English crowd in the eighteenth century. Past y Present, 50(1), 76–136. https://doi.org/10.1093/past/50.1.76.
Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121.
U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC). (2020). The Case (for and) Against Multi-Level Marketing. Recuperado de https://www.ftc.gov
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Usted es libre de:
- Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
- Adaptar — remezclar, transformar y construir a partir del material
Bajo los siguientes términos:
- Atribución — Usted debe dar crédito de manera adecuada, brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante.
- NoComercial — Usted no puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales.
