The benefits of Industry 4.0 in the automotive industry of Baja California:
Case study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51896/rilcods.v6i59.655Keywords:
Manufacturing industry, Industrial revolution, Benefit, Software, Qualitative analysis, InterviewAbstract
The objective of this study is to generate information on the contrast between theory and practice through the analysis of a case study. Using the deductive-inductive method, an interview is conducted with an expert in the automotive industry to understand the benefits of Industry 4.0 in the sector. The results highlight a lack of information regarding the concept of Industry 4.0, but demonstrate knowledge of its derivatives, such as additive manufacturing and cloud computing. Limitations include the possibility that, since the interview is individual, the interviewee may feel inhibited, which could affect the fluency of the conversation. The originality lies in the fact that, although the concept of Industry 4.0 is widely used in research, there are not many studies from grounded theory.
References
Antony, J. (2021). Industry 4.0 benefits, challenges critical succes factors: COmparative analysis through the lens of resource dependence theory across continents and economies. Journal of Manufacturing Tachnology Management, 1–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-10-2022-0371
Aydin Azizi, R. V. B. (2022). Industry 4.0 Technologies, Applications, and Challenges. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
Cugno, M., Castagnoli, R., & Büchi, G. (2021). Openness to Industry 4.0 and performance: The impact of barriers and incentives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 168, 120756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120756
De la Espriella, R., & Gómez Restrepo, C. (2020). Research methodology and critical reading of studies: Grounded theory. Revista Colombiana de PsiquiatríaColombiana de Psiquiatría, 49(2), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcpeng.2018.08.001
Elsevier. (2024). Scopus. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/
Eudaldo E. Espinoza - Freire. (2023). La enseñanza de las ciencias sociales mediante el método deductivoe. Revista Mexicana de Investigación e Intervención Educativa, 2, 34–41. Retrieved from https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0537-4760
Gagliano, T., & Alberto, P. (2016). La fenomenología y la argumentación jurídica: ¿una conexión posible?
García, J. I., Cano, R. E., & Contreras, J. D. (2020). Digital retrofit: A first step toward the adoption of Industry 4.0 to the manufacturing systems of small and medium-sized enterprises. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 234(8), 1156–1169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405420904852
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. In The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research (p. 4). New Jersey: Aldine Transaction.
Ingaldi, M., & Ulewicz, R. (2020). Problems with the implementation of industry 4.0 in enterprises from the SME sector. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12010217
Masood, T., & Sonntag, P. (2020). Industry 4.0: Adoption challenges and benefits for SMEs. Computers in Industry, 121, 103261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103261
Matt, D. T., Modrák, V., & Zsifkovits, H. (2021). Implementing Industry 4.0 in SMEs: Concepts, Examples and Applications. Implementing Industry 4.0 in SMEs: Concepts, Examples and Applications, 1–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70516-9
Palacios-Rodríguez, O. (2020). La teoría fundamentada: origen, supuestos y perspectivas Grounded Theory: Origin, Assumptions and Perspectives La teoría fundamentada: origen, supuestos y perspectivas. Revista Reflexión Teórica, 22, 47–70. Retrieved from https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8842-8233
Palmero Suárez, S. (2021). La enseñanza del componente gramatical: El método deductivo e inductivo. Trabajo de Fin de Máster, 1–67.
Palmett, A. (2020). Métodos inductivo, deductivo y teorpia de la pedagogía crítica. Revista Crítica Transdisciplinar, 3(1), 36–42. Retrieved from https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0537-4760
Sanguino, N. C. (2020). Fenomenología como método de investigación cualitativa: preguntas desde la práctica investigativa. Revista Latinoamericana de Metodología de La Investigación Social. Retrieved from http://relmis.com.ar/ojs/index.php/relmis/article/view/fenomenologia_como_metodo
Sony, M., & Mekoth, N. (2022). Employee adaptability skills for Industry 4.0 success: a road map. Production and Manufacturing Research, 10(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2022.2035281
Tarozzi, M. (2020). What is grounded theory? In What is grounded theory? (p. 47). New York: Bloomsbury.
Turner, C., & Astin, F. (2021). Grounded theory: what makes a grounded theory study? European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 20(3), 285–289. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvaa034
Zakoldaev, D. A., Gurjanov, A. V., Shukalov, A. V., & Zharinov, I. O. (2020). Products of the Industry 4.0 competence centers. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 734(1), 0–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/734/1/012043
Zakoldaev, D. A., Korobeynikov, A. G., Shukalov, A. V., Zharinov, I. O., & Zharinov, O. O. (2020). Industry 4.0 vs Industry 3.0: The role of personnel in production. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 734(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/734/1/012048
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Usted es libre de:
- Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
- Adaptar — remezclar, transformar y construir a partir del material
Bajo los siguientes términos:
- Atribución — Usted debe dar crédito de manera adecuada, brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante.
- NoComercial — Usted no puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales.
