Interconnection between violence towards animals and the social fabric:
Exploring the social and community consequences.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51896/ocsi.v5i4.631Keywords:
Animal abuse, social cohesion, social framework, animal welfareAbstract
The present study analyzes how animal abuse can act as a precursor to domestic violence and its impact on social cohesion. Using a socio-constructivist approach, the research focuses on exploring individuals' beliefs and perceptions about this phenomenon, and how continued exposure to animal cruelty desensitizes people to other forms of violence. At the community level, a decrease in social cohesion is observed in environments where animal abuse is common, which increases mistrust and insecurity. The methodology combines qualitative and quantitative approaches, revealing a widespread perception that animal abuse is linked to domestic violence. The results show that a high percentage of respondents recognize the relationship between animal abuse and domestic violence, as well as the negative impact on social cohesion. Furthermore, a widespread perception of ineffectiveness in public institutions to address the problem was identified, which contributes to impunity and perpetuates the cycle of violence. Animal abuse should be considered a social problem that goes beyond animal welfare, since it is closely linked to violence towards human beings. The implementation of public policies and educational programs on animal welfare could be a key strategy to prevent violence in general and strengthen the social framework.
Downloads
References
Arluke, A., & Sanders, C. R. (1996). Regarding animals. Philadelphia: Temple University.
Arluke, A. (2006). Just a dog: Understanding animal cruelty and ourselves. Temple University Press Philladelphia.
Arluke, A., Levin, J., Luke, C., & Ascione, F. (1999). The Relationship of Animal Abuse to Violence and Other Forms of Antisocial Behavior. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(9), 963-975.
Asamblea Nacional Constituyente. (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. Registro Oficial N.º 449. Quito, Ecuador
Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador. (2014). Código Orgánico Integral Penal. Registro Oficial Suplemento 180. Quito, Ecuador.
Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador. (2017). Código Orgánico del Ambiente. Registro Oficial N.º 983. Quito, Ecuador.
Ascione, F. R. (1993). Children Who Are Cruel to Animals: A Review of Research and Implications for Developmental Psychopathology. .Anthrozoös, 6(4), 226-247.
Ascione, F. y Shapiro, K. (2009). People and Animals, Kindness and Cruelty: Research Directions and Policy Implications. Journal of Social Issues
Ascione, F. (1996). Battered Women's Reports of Their Partners' and Their Children's Cruelty to Animals. Journal of Emotional Abuse, Volume 1, 1997.
Ascione, F. R. (2001). Animal abuse and youth violence. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Carrión, D., & Espinosa, C. (2020). El impacto de la desconfianza institucional en la prevalencia de la violencia en Ecuador. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Sociales, 15(2), 209-223.
Consejo de Europa. (1968). Convenio Europeo sobre la Protección de los Animales en el Transporte Internacional (p. 5).
Consejo de Europa. (1976). Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Animales en Explotaciones Ganaderas (p. 3).
DeGue, S. y DiLillo, D. (2009). Is animal cruelty a “red flag” for family violence? Investigating co-occurring violence toward children, partners, and pets. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(6), 1036-1056.
De la Torre, M. (2019). Corrupción y confianza en las instituciones: Un análisis de la percepción pública en América Latina. Editorial Andina.
Flynn, C. (2001). Acknowledging the "Zoological Connection": A Sociological Analysis of Animal Cruelty. A Sociological Analysis of Animal Cruelty. Society & Animals, 9(1), 71-87
Flynn, C. (2011). Flynn, C.P. Examining the links between animal abuse and human violence. Crime Law Soc Change 55, 453–468 (2011).
García, M. (2019). Protección internacional de los animales: Implicaciones en América Latina. Editorial Jurídica Latinoamericana.
González, R. (2020). Construcción social de la realidad: Enfoques y metodologías. Editorial Universitaria.
González, R., & Pérez, M. (2020). El ciclo de la violencia: De la crueldad animal a la violencia doméstica. Editorial Académica.
Gullone, E. (2012). Animal cruelty, antisocial behaviour, and aggression: More than a link. Palgrave Macmillan.
Liga Internacional de los Derechos del Animal. (1978). Declaración Universal de los Derechos del Animal (p. 2).
Lockwood, R., & Arluke, A. (1997). Guest editors' introduction: Understanding cruelty to animals. Society & Animals, 5(3), 183-193.
López, J., Moyano, G., Morán, G. (2024). Cultura del bienestar animal: Aproximación a los principios y percepción en la tenencia responsable de animales de compañía. Observatorio Iberoamericano del Desarrollo Local & la Economía Social ISSN: 1988-2483 Vol. 18 Núm. 36 (2024): Junio, 105 – 130.
Mason, GJ (2004). El bienestar de los animales en la agricultura. Rutledge.
McMillan, F, Duffy, D. y Serpell, J. (2011). Mental health of dogs formerly used as ‘breeding stock’ in commercial breeding establishments. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 135(1-2), 86-94.
Mota-Rojas, D., Monsalve, S., Lezama-García, K., Mora-Medina, P., Domínguez-Oliva, A., Ramírez-Necoechea, R., & Garcia, R. d. C. M. (2022). Animal Abuse as an Indicator of Domestic Violence: One Health, One Welfare Approach. Animals, 12(8), 977
McPhedran, S. (2009). Animal abuse, family violence, and child well-being: A review. Journal of Family Violence, 24(1), 41-52.
Martínez, L. (2019). Metodología de la investigación Social: Un enfoque integrado. Ediciones Académicas.
Organización Mundial de Sanidad Animal (2019). Código Sanitario para los Animales Terrestres
Overall, K. L. (2013). Animal welfare: Science and law. Wiley-Blackwell.
Pérez, L., & González, A. (2021). Violencia y cohesión social en América Latina: Un análisis desde la perspectiva de los derechos animales. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 27(3), 225-238.
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55.
Tomlinson, C. A., Murphy, J. L., Matijczak, A., Califano, A., Santos, J., & McDonald, S. E. (2022). The Link between Family Violence and Animal Cruelty: A Scoping Review. Social Sciences, 11(11), 514.
Wood, D. S., Weber, C. V., & Ascione, F. R. (1997). The Abuse of Animals and Domestic Violence: A National Survey of Shelters for Women who are Battered. Society & Animals, 5(3), 205-218. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853097X00132
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Javier López-Ruiz, Evelyn García-Carranza, Vicky Guillén-Cercado
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Usted es libre de:
- Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
- Adaptar — remezclar, transformar y construir a partir del material
Bajo los siguientes términos:
-
Atribución — Usted debe dar crédito de manera adecuada, brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante.
-
NoComercial — Usted no puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales.