v. 4 n. 1 (2026):
Artículos

Os temas centrais da crise ecossocial que o próprio activismo silencia: as dietas, o decrescimento e a demografia, ou o enigma tridimensional da extinção

PDF (Español (España)) HTML (Español (España)) PDF (English) HTML (English)
  • Jaym*/Jaime del Val
Jaym*/Jaime del Val
Instituto Metabody, Madrid.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51896/easc.v4i1.1236

Publicado 2026-05-30 — Atualizado em 2026-06-04

Versões

Palavras-chave

  • Crise,
  • antropocentrismo,
  • dieta alimentar,
  • decrescimento,
  • sobrepopulação,
  • extinção,
  • desinformação
    • ...Mais
    Menos

Como Citar

del Val, J. (2026). Os temas centrais da crise ecossocial que o próprio activismo silencia: as dietas, o decrescimento e a demografia, ou o enigma tridimensional da extinção. Revista Internacional De Educación Y Análisis Social Crítico Mañé, Ferrer & Swartz, 4(1), 310–368. https://doi.org/10.51896/easc.v4i1.1236 (Original work published 30º de maio de 2026)
Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Resumo

Este artigo aborda a confusão e a desinformação prevalecentes em torno das principais respostas à crise ecossocial. Apresenta uma revisão comparativa da literatura e tira conclusões sobre as três respostas prioritárias, que designamos por 3D: transição para dietas baseadas em vegetais, decrescimento profundo e o tabu demográfico da sobrepopulação — questões sistematicamente excluídas do atual ativismo ecossocial e animal. Recorrendo a argumentos antropológicos e filosóficos, o artigo questiona a predominância das perspetivas antropocêntricas e eurocêntricas no ativismo convencional e propõe um “contínuo de decrescimento” que considera o impacto zero na biosfera como uma opção maximalista e realista. Por fim, explica brevemente as razões para a dupla negação sistémica prevalecente destas questões: a negação explícita, baseada na desinformação disseminada pelos lobistas, e a negação implícita, imposta pelo supremacismo humano generalizado e pela relutância das pessoas dos países ricos em questionar os seus privilégios e confortos. O conjunto de propostas apresentado neste artigo, que se centra na correção dos enviesamentos antropocêntricos e eurocêntricos nos discursos predominantes na sociedade contemporânea e no ativismo global, visa oferecer ferramentas interseccionais críticas para superar a desinformação e os enviesamentos da supremacia humana, que se apresentam como condição sine qua non para um futuro habitável.

PDF (Español (España)) HTML (Español (España)) PDF (English) HTML (English)

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

  1. Alcalá-Santiago, Á., Rodríguez-Martín N. M., Casas-Albertos, E., Gálvez-Navas, J. M., Castelló-Pastor, A., García-Villanova, B. & Molina-Montes, E. (2025). Nutrient adequacy and environmental footprint of Mediterranean, pesco-, ovo-lacto-, and vegan menus: A modelling study. Frontiers in Nutrition, 12, 1681512. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1681512
  2. Almazán, A., & Riechmann, J. (2023). Desafíos poliéticos de las transiciones energéticas. Arbor, 199(807), Article a689. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2023.807003
  3. Araújo, F. R. P. d., Pereira, M. G., Freitas, M. A. V., da Silva, N. F., & Dantas, E. J. d. A. (2021). Bigger Is Not Always Better: Review of Small Wind in Brazil. Energies, 14(4), 976. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14040976
  4. Bergman, J., Pedersen, R.Ø., Lundgren, E.J. et al. (2023). Worldwide Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene population declines in extant megafauna are associated with Homo sapiens expansion rather than climate change. Nature Communications, 14(1), 7679. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43426-5
  5. Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., Zucman, G., & Alvaredo, F. (2022). World inequality report 2022. World Inequality Lab. https://wir2022.wid.world
  6. Chefurka, B. P. (2019). Carrying capacity, overshoot and sustainability. Energy Skeptic. https://energyskeptic.com/2019/bodhi-paul-chefurka-carrying-capacity-overshoot-and-sustainability/
  7. Crist, E., Mora, C., & Engelman, R. (2017). The interaction of human population, food production, and biodiversity protection. Science, 356(6335), 260–264. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal2011
  8. Crist, E., Ripple, W. J., Ehrlich, P. R., Rees, W. E., & Wolf, C. (2022). Scientists’ warning on population. Science of the Total Environment, 845, 157166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157166
  9. Del Val, J. (2023). 1st liveable futures report: Food of mass destruction—How exploiting animals drives us to extinction. Reverso/Metabody Institute. https://metabody.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/1st-LIVEABLE-FUTURES-REPORT-Full-August2023-1-1-1-1.pdf
  10. Del Val, J. (2024a). Ontohackers: Radical movement philosophy in the age of extinctions and algorithms. Part I. punctum books. https://doi.org/10.53288/0402.1.00
  11. Del Val, J. (2024b). Los océanos se salvan en tu plato. Instituto Metabody. https://metabody.eu/es/los-oceanos-se-salvan-en-tu-plato/
  12. Del Val, J. (2024c). Descolonización terrestre y nuestro futuro como recolectores. En ¡Cuerpo, Máquina, Acción!, 8(10), 20–38. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/175275
  13. Del Val, J. (2024d). La verdad del consumo. Metabody. https://metabody.eu/es/la-verdad-del-consumo/
  14. Del Val, J. (2024e). Por qué no es defendible la ganadería extensiva. Metabody. https://metabody.eu/es/por-que-no-es-defendible-la-ganaderia-extensiva/
  15. Del Val, J. (2025a). Metacuerpos: Un contrapocalipsis. Reverso–Metabody. https://metabody.eu/es/metacuerpos-libro/
  16. Del Val, J. (2025b). Ontohackers: Radical movement philosophy in the age of extinctions and algorithms. Part II. punctum books.
  17. Del Val, J., & Mas, R. (2024). Oculto a primera vista: El lobby ganadero-alimentario en los movimientos ecologistas y climáticos. Instituto Metabody. https://metabody.eu/es/informe-lobby-ganadero-movimiento-ecologista/
  18. Eisen, M. B., & Brown, P. O. (2022). Rapid global phaseout of animal agriculture has the potential to stabilize greenhouse gas levels for 30 years. PLOS Climate, 1(2), e0000010. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000010
  19. FAO. (2006). Livestock’s long shadow: Environmental issues and options. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/3/a0701e/a0701e00.htm
  20. Fowler, C. W. (2008). Maximizing biodiversity, information, and sustainability. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17, 841–855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9327-2
  21. Fowler, C. W. (2009). The human population evaluated by interspecific comparisons (Appendix 6.4). In C. W. Fowler, Systemic management: Sustainable human interactions with ecosystems and the biosphere (Appendix). Oxford University Press.
  22. https://apps-afsc.fisheries.noaa.gov/Publications/misc_pdf/Fowler-book/Appendix06-4.pdf
  23. Fowler, C. W., & Hobbs, L. (2003). Is humanity sustainable? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 270(1533), 2579–2583. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2553
  24. Gowdy, J. (2020). Our hunter-gatherer future: Climate change, agriculture, and uncivilization. Futures, 115, 102488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.102488
  25. Graeber, D., & Wengrow, D. (2022). El amanecer de todo: Una nueva historia de la humanidad. Ariel.
  26. Greenpeace. (2018). Menos es más. Reducir la producción y consumo de carne para una vida y planeta más saludable. Informe realizado por Greenpeace Internacional sobre el sistema de producción de carne y lácteos en 2050. Greenpeace. https://es.greenpeace.org/es/sala-de-prensa/informes/menos-es-mas/
  27. Greenpeace. (2020). Food for a healthier life and planet. Greenpeace.
  28. https://www.greenpeace.org/static/planet4-eu-unit-stateless/2020/03/bb093564-200310-briefing-food-healthier-life-planet.pdf
  29. Gupta, J., Liverman, D., Prodani, K., et al. (2023). Earth system justice needed to identify and live within Earth system boundaries. Nature Sustainability, 6, 630–638. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-023-01064-1
  30. Guterres, A. (2022). “Secretary-General's remarks to High-Level opening of COP27.” UN. https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/speeches/2022-11-07/secretary-generals-remarks-high-level-opening-of-cop27
  31. Harari, Y. N. (2015). Sapiens: De animales a dioses. Debate.
  32. Haraway, D. J. (2020). Seguir con el problema: Generar parentesco en el Chthuluceno. Consonni.
  33. Hickel, J. (2020). Less is more: How degrowth will save the world. William Heinemann.
  34. Hickel, J., & Sullivan, D. (2024). How much growth is required to achieve good lives for all? Insights from needs-based analysis. World Development Perspectives, 35, 100612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2024.100612
  35. Hidalgo-Capitán, A. L., García-Álvarez, S., Cubillo-Guevara, A. P., & Medina-Carranco, N. (2019). Los objetivos del Buen Vivir: Una propuesta alternativa a los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible. Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies, 8(1), 6–57. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.354
  36. IPBES. (2019). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services. IPBES Secretariat. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673
  37. IPBES. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. (2020). Workshop report on biodiversity and pandemics. IPBES Secretariat. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4147317
  38. IPCC. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2019). Food security. En Climate Change and Land: IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems (pp. 437–550). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157988.007
  39. IPCC. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). AR6 synthesis report: Summary for policymakers. En H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.), Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team,] (1-115). Doi: 10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647
  40. Jackson, P., & Jackson, M. (2025). The relationship between dietary preference and food waste: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science, 13(1), 1-12. https://www.jscimedcentral.com/jounal-article-pdf/Journal-of-Human-Nutrition-and-Food-Science/nutrition-13-1194.pdf
  41. Kent, S. (Ed.). (1992). Cultural diversity among twentieth-century foragers: An African perspective. Cambridge University Press.
  42. Leakey, R. E., & Lewin, R. (1977). Origins: What discoveries reveal about the emergence of our species and its possible future. E. P. Dutton.
  43. Lauber, K., et al. (2025). The animal agriculture industry’s role in obstructing climate action. En J. T. Roberts, C. R. S. Milani, J. Jacquet, & C. Downie (Eds.), Climate Obstruction: A Global Assessment (98-138). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197787144.003.0004
  44. Lee, R. B. (1965). Subsistence ecology of !Kung Bushmen. University of California Press.
  45. Lee, R. B. (1979). The !Kung San: Men, women and work in a foraging society. Cambridge University Press.
  46. Lenton, T. M., Rockström, J., Gaffney, O., Rahmstorf, S., Richardson, K., Steffen, W. & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2019). Climate tipping points—Too risky to bet against. Nature, 575, 592–595. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03595-0
  47. McCallum, M. L. (2015). Vertebrate biodiversity losses point to a sixth mass extinction. Biodiversity and Conservation, 24, 2497–2519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0940-6
  48. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. & Behrens III, W. W. (1972). The Limits to Growth; A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind. Universe Books. https://archive.org/details/limitstogrowthr00mead
  49. [MC] Ministerio de Consumo & European Commission–Joint Research Centre. (2022). Sostenibilidad del consumo en España: Evaluación del impacto ambiental asociado a los patrones de consumo. Ministerio de Consumo.
  50. https://www.miteco.gob.es/es/ceneam/recursos/pag-web/informe-sostenibilidad-consumo-espana.aspx
  51. Plowright, R. K., Parrish, C. R., McCallum, H., Hudson, P. J., Ko, A. I., Graham, A. L., & Lloyd-Smith, J. O. (2021). Land use–induced spillover: A call to action to safeguard environmental, animal, and human health. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(4), e237–e245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00031-0
  52. Raworth, K. (2012). A safe and just space for humanity: Can we live within the doughnut? Oxfam.
  53. Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. Penguin Random House.
  54. Richardson, K., … Rockström, J. (2023). Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Science Advances, 9(37), eadh2458. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458
  55. Riechmann, J., Almazán, A., Madorrán, C., & Santiago Muíño, E. (2018). Ecosocialismo descalzo: Tentativas. Icaria.
  56. Ripple, W. J., Wolf, C., Newsome, T. M., Barnard, P. & Moomaw, W. R. (2020). World scientists’ warning of a climate emergency. BioScience, 70(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz088
  57. Ripple, W. J., Wolf, C., Newsome, T. M., Galetti, M., Alamgir, M., Crist, E., Mahmoud, M. I. & Laurance, W. F. (2017). World scientists’ warning to humanity: A second notice. BioScience, 67(12), 1026-1028. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix125
  58. Rushkoff, D. (2023). La supervivencia de los más ricos. Fantasía escapista de los milmillonarios tecnológicos. Capitán Swing
  59. [SCBD] Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. (2020). Global biodiversity outlook 5: Summary for policymakers. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. https://www.cbd.int/gbo/gbo5/publication/gbo-5-spm-en.pdf
  60. Sahlins, M. (1968). Notes on the original affluent society. In R. B. Lee & I. DeVore (Eds.), Man the hunter (pp. 85–89). Aldine.
  61. Sahlins, M. (2017). Stone age economics (Original work published 1972). Routledge.
  62. Scott, J. C. (2017). Against the grain: A deep history of the earliest states. Yale University Press.
  63. Shiva, V. (2008). Monocultivos de la mente. Fineo.
  64. Spratt, D., & Dunlop, I. (2019). Existential climate-related security risk: A scenario approach. National Centre for Climate Restoration (Breakthrough). http://mycoasts.org/commons/library/2019_Spratt_Dunlop.pdf
  65. Suzman, J. (2021). Trabajo: Una historia de cómo empleamos el tiempo. Debate.
  66. Trust, S., Saye, L., Bettis, O., Bedenham, G., Hampshire, O., Lenton, T. M. & Abrams, J. F. (2025). Planetary solvency: Finding our balance with nature. Global risk management for human prosperity. University of Exeter. https://actuaries.org.uk/media/ni4erlna/planetary-solvency.pdf
  67. Turiel, A. (2020). Petrocalipsis: Crisis energética global y cómo (no) la vamos a solucionar. Alfabeto.
  68. UNEP. 2010. Assessing the Envinronmental Impact of Production and Consumption. UNEP. https://www.resourcepanel.org/reports/assessing-environmental-impacts-consumption-and-production
  69. UNGA. United Nations General Assembly. (2022). The human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment. United Nations. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3982508
  70. Vernadsky, V. I. (1998). The biosphere (Publicación original de 1926). Springer.
  71. Waldhorn, D. R., & Autric, E. (2022, December 21). Shrimp: The animals most commonly used and killed for food production [Preprint]. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/b8n3t
  72. Willett, W., et al. (2019). Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet, 393(10170), 447–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4
  73. Wynes, S., & Nicholas, K. A. (2017). The climate mitigation gap: Education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions. Environmental Research Letters, 12, 074024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7541
  74. Yunkaporta, T. (2023). Escrito en la Arena. Cómo el Pensamiento Indígena Puede Salvar el Mundo. Herder
  75. Zerzan, J. (1994). Future primitive. Autonomedia.