Crowdunfing: an application in structural equation modelling (SEM) Emprendedurismo
Published 2023-10-03
Keywords
- crowdfunding,
- SEM modelling,
- Fintech
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract
The economic situation in the country and the world in general has led to new ways for entrepreneurs and investors to raise funds. In addition, Fintech technology has led to new models of technological finance. The objective of this study is to learn about the application of Structural Equation Modelling based on the theory for the construction of models focused on crowdfunding, for entrepreneurial and non-entrepreneurial financing. The methodology to be used will be a critical review of theory-driven structural models. The expected results will help to disseminate this methodology for fundraising for various business and non-business projects. In addition, to make use of Structural Equation Modelling as part of testing conceptual, theoretical models, as well as testing theory, postulating new theoretical perspectives or, where appropriate, extending existing theory.
References
- Baber, H. (2022). Entrepreneurial and Crowdfunding Intentions of Management Students in South Korea. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable development, 18(1), 48-61.
- Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S.R., Hall, A.V. (2017). Social Exchange Theory: A Critical Review with Theoretical Remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 479-516.
- Elali, W., and Al-Yacoub, B. (2016): Factors affecting entrepreneurial intentions among Kuwaitis. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp.18-34.
- Krystallia Moysidou & J. Piet Hausberg (2020). In crowdfunding we trust: A trust-building model in lending crowdfunding, Journal of Small Business Management, 58:3, 511-543, DOI: 10.1080/00472778.2019.1661682
- Krueger Jr, N.F., Reilly, M.D. and Carsrud, A.L. (2000): Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions.Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 15, Nos 5-6, pp.411-432.
- Mitchell, M. S., Cropanzano, R., & Quisenberry, D. (2012). Social exchange theory, exchange resources and interpersonal relationships: A modest resolution of theoretical difficulties. In K. Tornblom & A. Kazemi (Eds.), Handbook of social resource theory: Theoretical extensions, empirical insights, and social applications: 99–118. New York, NY: Springer.
- Moysidou, K. & Hausber, J.P. (2020) In crowdfunding we trust: A trust-building model in lending crowdfunding, Journal of Small Bus Management, 58:3, 511-543, DOI: 10.1080/00472778.2019.1661682
- Tuo, G., Feng, Y., and Sarpong, S. (2019). A configurational model of reward-based crowdfunding project characteristics and operational approaches to delivery performance. Decis. Support Syst. 120, 60–71. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2019.03.013
- Stewart, K. J. (2003). Trust transfer on the World Wide Web. Organization Science, 14(1), 5–17. doi:10.1287/orsc.14.1.5.12810
- Yang, X., Zhao, K., Tao, X., Shiu, E. (2019). Developing and Validating a Theory-Based Model of Crowdfunding Investment Intention—Perspectives from Social Exchange Theory and Customer Value Perspective. Sustainability, 11, 1-18.
- Yuan, Y.; Chen, L. China Crowdfunding Industry Development Research; Shanghai Jiaotong University Press: Shanghai, China, 2018.
- Wu, Y. J., & Yuan, C. H. (2022). Crowdfunding Curriculum Design Based on Outcome-Based Education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 845012-845012.
- Zaremohzzabieh, Z., Ahrari, S., Krauss, S.E., Samah, A.A., Meng, L.K. and Ariffin, Z. (2019): Predicting social entrepreneurial intention: A meta-analytic path analysis based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 96, pp.264-276.